Dissertation Abstract
Burning For The Other: Semiotics Of A Levinasian Theological Aesthetics
In Light Of Burning Man
by
Stevens,
Richard
Degree: Ph.D.
Year: 2003
Pages: 00406
Institution: Graduate Theological
Advisor: Don H. Compier
Source: DAI, 64, no. 11A (2003): p. 4094
Three concepts are compared: (1) the human subject
in Emmanuel Levinas' work Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence, (2) the sign
in Charles Peirce's semiotics, and (3) the work of art in the ethical-aesthetic
milieu of the annual Burning Man event in
On the basis of this idea,
a critique can be introduced of its three sources. Peirce's semiotic view of
the human subject as sign gains the ethical dimension Peirce sought for it.
Levinas' aesthetics asserts primarily that art addresses reality's "shadow,"
where participants can become immersed in idolatry, in existing as mere
things-among-things. He later recognizes art's positive side in an art for
relationship. The dichotomy provokes a search for a formal description differentiating
art's two aspects. Levinas' essays on Blanchot show how he finds
substitutionary, ethical acts in art without denying art's shadow side. Finally
Burning Man gains a theoretical basis that demonstrates that its gift-giving
ethos and its art-making program are intrinsically joined in the responsibility
of Levinas' "Saying" as "substitution." Art's positive side
is best seen not as creation or revelation but as sacrifice. The Burning Man
figure is an example of this sacrifice because of the human connection in
responsibility for which it burns. All signs expend themselves in a similar
way, and I as a human subject, as signifier, am constituted to do so as well.
SUBJECT(S)
Descriptor: THEOLOGY, PHILOSOPHY, ART HISTORY
(Emmanuel
Levinas, Charles Sanders Peirce)
Accession
No: AAI3110192
Provider: OCLC
Database: Dissertations